AI assists. Humans decide.
Anything that rewrites your scope waits for a human approval. The coach's job is to do the boring work, not to change your plan unsupervised.
Three of us spent a decade shipping products at companies where the most important artefact — the decision behind a feature — was a Slack thread nobody could find six months later. Every new hire repeated mistakes the team had already made.
We tried the usual things. Notion templates. Linear automations. AI assistants that summarised meetings nobody re-read. None of them changed the loop: ideas got fuzzy, scope got political, and the repo and the strategy drifted apart.
Jary is what we wanted instead. A coach that pressure-tests an idea through six phases. A workspace that remembers what the team decided and why. Agents that do the work nobody wants to, with humans in the loop on anything that matters.
Anything that rewrites your scope waits for a human approval. The coach's job is to do the boring work, not to change your plan unsupervised.
When the coach asserts something about a competitor or the market, you can click straight to the source. No vibes.
We will not ship another configurable framework. Sensible defaults, opinionated workflows, and a workspace that gets out of the way.
Most PM tools start with tickets. We start with the idea, then earn the ticket. That's why the coach refuses to write a spec until it's ready.